EPA's chrysotile asbestos ban stays in effect while a federal appeals court weighs challenges
The federal rule that phases out the last ongoing uses of chrysotile asbestos in the United States remains in effect while the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit considers challenges to it. The court heard oral argument on June 1, 2026.
Last reviewed October 29, 2026 against the sources listed at the end of this page.
In short
- EPA finalized the rule in March 2024 under the Toxic Substances Control Act (89 Fed. Reg. 21970).
- It bans chrysotile asbestos in brake products and most gaskets on short timelines and phases out asbestos diaphragms in the chlor-alkali industry over years.
- Industry groups argue it goes too far; the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization argues it does not go far enough. In July 2025 EPA dropped a plan to rewrite the rule and chose to defend it.
- The rule lets the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site in South Carolina keep using asbestos sheet gaskets through 2037.
Event date: June 1, 2026. Posted October 29, 2026; updated October 29, 2026.
What the rule does
Chrysotile is the only form of asbestos still known to be imported, processed, or distributed for use in the United States, according to EPA. EPA's March 2024 rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act bans the use of asbestos in oilfield brake blocks, aftermarket automotive brakes and linings, other vehicle friction products, and other gaskets six months after the rule took effect, and bans most asbestos-containing sheet gaskets after two years. EPA banned imports of asbestos for chlor-alkali use immediately; the eight plants that still use asbestos diaphragms get phase-outs of up to 12 years, tied to converting each facility. Sheet gaskets used to make titanium dioxide or to process nuclear material get five-year phase-outs.
One exception has a South Carolina connection. EPA allows asbestos-containing sheet gaskets to continue to be used through 2037 at the Department of Energy's Savannah River Site, which EPA says is to keep the safe disposal of nuclear materials on schedule without unnecessarily exposing workers to radioactive materials.
Where the court case stands
Challenges to the rule were consolidated in the Fifth Circuit. Industry associations, including chemistry trade groups, challenged the ban; the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization also sued, arguing the ban is not as airtight as it needs to be. In June 2025 EPA told the court it planned to rewrite parts of the ban. In July 2025, the Associated Press reported, EPA dropped that plan and said in a court filing that it would defend the ban, while reconsidering some interim workplace-protection requirements.
Court filings show that one petitioner, Olin Corporation, dismissed its petition on May 6, 2026, and that the industry petitioners withdrew one of their arguments on May 19, 2026, while keeping their other challenges. The court heard argument on June 1, 2026. As of this post, we have not found a decision. Until the court rules, the rule's deadlines apply as written.
Why it matters to patients and families
This case is about future uses of asbestos. It does not change the medical care, filing deadlines, trust claims, or VA benefits available to people already diagnosed after past exposure. See asbestos exposure for the jobs and products historically linked to asbestos.
911Meso.com news covers major developments only: verdicts and court rulings, trust payment changes, EPA asbestos rules, FDA actions and major research, and cancer-center designations. Each item links to its primary sources. It is general information, not legal or medical advice. Laws can change, and results in one case do not predict another.
Get our printable guide to diagnosis, treatment, and legal options by email.
Get the guideThis is a news summary for general information, based on the sources below. It is not legal or medical advice. Laws can change, and results in one case do not predict another. Talk with your doctor about treatment questions and with a licensed attorney about legal ones.
Sources
- Risk management for asbestos, part 1: chrysotile asbestos (U.S. EPA)
- Asbestos Part 1: Chrysotile Asbestos; Regulation of Certain Conditions of Use Under TSCA, 89 Fed. Reg. 21970 (Federal Register, March 28, 2024)
- Industry Petitioners' notice of withdrawal of issue, Texas Chemistry Council v. EPA, No. 24-60193 (5th Cir., filed May 19, 2026; copy hosted by the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization)
- Trump administration pulls back on plans to rewrite Biden-era asbestos ban (Associated Press, July 8, 2025, via Tri City Record)